Table 2 Table showing the rankings proposed by the FH, CKA, and GD methods for the IMs described by the A, D, E\(_{AA}\), E\(_{AD}\), and E\(_{DD}\) kinship kernels on the IBDSNP dataset
FH ranking | FH weights | CKA ranking | CKA weights | CKACLOSED ranking | CKACLOSED weights | GD ranking | GD weights |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E\(_{AA}\) | 0.364 | D | 0.027 | D | 1818.91 | E\(_{AA}\) | 0.343 |
E\(_{DD}\) | 0.269 | A | 0.025 | E\(_{DD}\) | 1516.01 | E\(_{DD}\) | 0.323 |
E\(_{AD}\) | 0.232 | E\(_{DD}\) | 0.018 | A | 1205.03 | E\(_{AD}\) | 0.221 |
D | 0.070 | E\(_{AD}\) | 0.018 | E\(_{AD}\) | 917.83 | D | 0.056 |
A | 0.062 | E\(_{AA}\) | 0.018 | E\(_{AA}\) | 558.59 | A | 0.055 |