Peer Review reports
From: Missing cell types in single-cell references impact deconvolution of bulk data but are detectable
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 May 2024 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Jul 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 29 Jul 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 1 Oct 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Casey S. Greene |
| 23 Oct 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 1 Nov 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 13 Dec 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Casey S. Greene |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 1 Oct 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Jan 2025 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 21 Jan 2025 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 5 Feb 2025 | Author responded | Author comments - Casey S. Greene |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 5 Feb 2025 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Author responded | Author comments - Casey S. Greene |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 11 Feb 2025 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Feb 2025 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Apr 2025 | Article published | 10.1186/s13059-025-03506-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.