Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Genome Biology

Fig. 2

From: Engineering a bacterial toxin deaminase from the DYW-family into a novel cytosine base editor for plants and mammalian cells

Fig. 2

SsdAtox-CBE variants enable C-to-T editing of a GUSG537 reporter in N. benthamiana. a Schematic of the GUSG537 cytosine base editing reporter. The C-to-T (highlighted in red) editing in GUSG537 can alter the glycine codon (GGA) to a glutamic acid codon (GAA) and restore GUS activity. The protospacer is shown with gray background, and the PAM is in blue. b Ten different A. tumefaciens transformants were co-inoculated together with the GUS537 reporter into N. benthamiana leaves. Leaf disks were harvested 2 dpi then stained in GUS staining solution and de-stained in ethanol. Blue color indicates restored GUS activity. Dark blue leaf disk from clone #7 are marked by triangles. WT GUS: wild-type GUS, positive control. GUSG537: negative control. c Sanger sequencing results from A. tumefaciens clone #7 between days 1 and 10. Mismatches to the wild-type sequence are highlighted in red and indicated by triangles. d Top: Architectures of CBEs containing SsdAG103S-v1, SsdAG103R-v1, SsdAG103A-v1, or SsdAG103C-v1. An intron was introduced into the coding sequences of these SsdA variants to prohibit translation in bacteria. Bottom: C-to-T editing efficiencies of SsdA-CBE variants of the GUSG537 reporter. GUS activities were measured and normalized to 2 × 35S::GUS (WT GUS, positive control). Values and error bars indicate the mean ± SEM, n = 3. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01 using Student’s two-tailed unpaired t-test

Back to article page