Fig. 4

Comparing VirRep’s performance with that of other methods and method combinations on simulated metagenomic samples with varying viral proportions. a Precision-recall curves for VirRep, geNomad, and the six alignment-free methods at viral proportions of 5, 10, 50, and 90%. Numbers show the AUPRC (area under the precision-recall curve) values. b Average F1 score, precision and recall for VirRep, geNomad, and the five method combinations composed of VirSorter2 and one alignment-free method at viral proportions of 5, 10, 50, and 90%. c Average F1 score, precision and recall for VirRep, geNomad, and method combinations composed of VIBRANT and one alignment-free method at viral proportions of 5, 10, 50, and 90%. Error bar shows the 95% confidence intervals over 5 replicates