Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Genome Biology

Fig. 3

From: Massively integrated coexpression analysis reveals transcriptional regulation, evolution and cellular implications of the yeast noncanonical translatome

Fig. 3

Biological processes associated with nORF transcriptional regulation. A,B Biological processes that are more (A) (odds ratio > 2, n = 16 terms) or less (B) (odds ratio < 0.5, n = 23 terms) transcriptionally associated with nORFs than cORFs (y-axis ordered by nORF enrichment proportion from highest to lowest, BH adjusted FDR < 0.001 for all terms, Fisher’s exact test, GO term enrichments were detected using gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA), error bars: standard error of the proportion). C nORFs that are highly coexpressed with genes involved in transport are more likely to have predicted transmembrane (TM) domains as determined by TMHMM [79] compared to nORFs that are not (odds ratio = 1.6, Fisher’s exact test p = 1.3e−4; error bars: standard error of the proportion). D nORFs and cORFs that are Sfp1 or Hsf1 targets are more likely to be downregulated when Sfp1 or Hsf1 are deleted compared to ORFs that are not targets (Sfp1: cORFs: p < 2.2e−16; nORFs: p = 2.8e−9; Hsf1: cORFs: p <2.2e−16; nORFs: p = 9.9e−13; Fisher’s exact test, error bars: 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio; dashed line shows odds ratio of 1; RNA abundance data from SRA accession SRP159150 and SRP437124 [80] respectively). E nORFs that are regulated by TFs are more likely to be coexpressed with genes involved in processes related to known functions of that TF. Created with BioRender.com

Back to article page